[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11c9c70f-5192-9f02-c622-f6e03db7dfb2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:01:16 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Vincas Dargis <vindrg@...il.com>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About r8169 regression 5.4
On 21.02.2020 21:21, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> 2020-02-20 20:32, Heiner Kallweit rašė:
>> It would be great if you could test one more thing. Few chip versions have a hw issue with tx checksumming
>> for very small packets. Maybe your chip version suffers from the same issue.
>> Could you please test the following patch (with all features enabled, TSO and checksumming)?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> index 8442b8767..bee90af57 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> @@ -4345,6 +4345,7 @@ static netdev_features_t rtl8169_features_check(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_12:
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_17:
>> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_34:
>> + case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_44:
>> features &= ~NETIF_F_CSUM_MASK;
>> break;
>> default:
>>
>
> Sadly, network got hanged after ~1.5h of usage. I've built it with Debian's "debian/bin/test-patches" helper (kernel is now named 5.4.19-1a~test),
> double-checked that line was actually added in source. `ethtool -K enp5s0f1 tx on sg on tso on` was executed after boot.
OK, thanks anyway for testing. I forwarded your testing results with Realtek's r8168 driver to Realtek,
let's see whether they can identify the root cause of the problem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists