netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix trampoline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87eeuo5jgg.fsf@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:21:51 +0000
From:   Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com,
        kernel-team@...com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix trampoline_count clean up logic

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:05 PM GMT, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Libbpf's Travis CI tests caught this issue. Ensure bpf_link and bpf_object
> clean up is performed correctly.
>
> Fixes: d633d57902a5 ("selftest/bpf: Add test for allowed trampolines count")
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> ---
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/trampoline_count.c         | 25 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trampoline_count.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trampoline_count.c
> index 1f6ccdaed1ac..781c8d11604b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trampoline_count.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trampoline_count.c
> @@ -55,31 +55,40 @@ void test_trampoline_count(void)
>  	/* attach 'allowed' 40 trampoline programs */
>  	for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRAMP_PROGS; i++) {
>  		obj = bpf_object__open_file(object, NULL);
> -		if (CHECK(IS_ERR(obj), "obj_open_file", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(obj)))
> +		if (CHECK(IS_ERR(obj), "obj_open_file", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(obj))) {
> +			obj = NULL;
>  			goto cleanup;
> +		}
>
>  		err = bpf_object__load(obj);
>  		if (CHECK(err, "obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
>  			goto cleanup;
>  		inst[i].obj = obj;
> +		obj = NULL;
>
>  		if (rand() % 2) {
> -			link = load(obj, fentry_name);
> -			if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach prog", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
> +			link = load(inst[i].obj, fentry_name);
> +			if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach prog", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) {
> +				link = NULL;
>  				goto cleanup;
> +			}
>  			inst[i].link_fentry = link;
>  		} else {
> -			link = load(obj, fexit_name);
> -			if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach prog", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link)))
> +			link = load(inst[i].obj, fexit_name);
> +			if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach prog", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) {
> +				link = NULL;
>  				goto cleanup;
> +			}
>  			inst[i].link_fexit = link;
>  		}
>  	}
>
>  	/* and try 1 extra.. */
>  	obj = bpf_object__open_file(object, NULL);
> -	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(obj), "obj_open_file", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(obj)))
> +	if (CHECK(IS_ERR(obj), "obj_open_file", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(obj))) {
> +		obj = NULL;
>  		goto cleanup;
> +	}
>
>  	err = bpf_object__load(obj);
>  	if (CHECK(err, "obj_load", "err %d\n", err))
> @@ -104,7 +113,9 @@ void test_trampoline_count(void)
>  cleanup_extra:
>  	bpf_object__close(obj);
>  cleanup:
> -	while (--i) {
> +	if (i >= MAX_TRAMP_PROGS)
> +		i = MAX_TRAMP_PROGS - 1;
> +	for (; i >= 0; i--) {
>  		bpf_link__destroy(inst[i].link_fentry);
>  		bpf_link__destroy(inst[i].link_fexit);
>  		bpf_object__close(inst[i].obj);

I'm not sure I'm grasping what the fix is about.

We don't access obj or link from cleanup, so what is the point of
setting them to NULL before jumping there?

Or is it all just an ancillary change to clamping the loop index
variable to (MAX_TRAMP_PROGS - 1)?