netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 4/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: add node for Felix switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 22 Feb 2020 14:25:36 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next/devicetree 4/5] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: add
 node for Felix switch

Hi Michael,

On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 13:38, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>

> > +
> > +                     enetc_port2: ethernet@0,2 {
> > +                             compatible = "fsl,enetc";
> > +                             reg = <0x000200 0 0 0 0>;
> > +                             phy-mode = "gmii";
> Can we disable this port by default in this dtsi? As mentioned in the other
> mail, I'd prefer to have all ports disabled because it doesn't make sense
> to have this port while having all the external ports disabled.
>

Ok. What would you want to happen with the "ethernet" property? Do you
want the board dts to set that too?

> > +                                     /* Internal port with DSA tagging */
> > +                                     mscc_felix_port4: port@4 {
> > +                                             reg = <4>;
> > +                                             phy-mode = "internal";
> > +                                             ethernet = <&enetc_port2>;
> Likewise, I'd prefer to have this disabled.
>

Ok.

> > +                     enetc_port3: ethernet@0,6 {
> > +                             compatible = "fsl,enetc";
> > +                             reg = <0x000600 0 0 0 0>;
> > +                             status = "disabled";
> > +                             phy-mode = "gmii";
> shouldn't the status be after the phy-mode property?

Why?

>
> -michael
>

Regards,
-Vladimir