[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200224145644.317843926@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:01:49 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [patch V3 18/22] bpf: Replace open coded recursion prevention in sys_bpf()
The required protection is that the caller cannot be migrated to a
different CPU as these functions end up in places which take either a hash
bucket lock or might trigger a kprobe inside the memory allocator. Both
scenarios can lead to deadlocks. The deadlock prevention is per CPU by
incrementing a per CPU variable which temporarily blocks the invocation of
BPF programs from perf and kprobes.
Replace the open coded preempt_[dis|en]able and __this_cpu_[inc|dec] pairs
with the new helper functions. These functions are already prepared to make
BPF work on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels. No functional change for !RT
kernels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
V3: Restrict it to sys_bpf(). Hashtab code is already handled.
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -171,11 +171,7 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct b
flags);
}
- /* must increment bpf_prog_active to avoid kprobe+bpf triggering from
- * inside bpf map update or delete otherwise deadlocks are possible
- */
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
err = bpf_percpu_hash_update(map, key, value, flags);
@@ -206,8 +202,7 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct b
err = map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
return err;
@@ -222,8 +217,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf
if (bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map))
return bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem(map, key, value);
- preempt_disable();
- this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
@@ -268,8 +262,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
return err;
@@ -1136,13 +1129,11 @@ static int map_delete_elem(union bpf_att
goto out;
}
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
rcu_read_lock();
err = map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
rcu_read_unlock();
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
out:
kfree(key);
@@ -1254,13 +1245,11 @@ int generic_map_delete_batch(struct bpf_
break;
}
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
rcu_read_lock();
err = map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
rcu_read_unlock();
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
if (err)
break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists