[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSd8P6uQnwisZEh7+nfowW9qKLBEvA4GPg+xUkjBa-6TDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 14:27:42 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com
Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio: Work around frames incorrectly marked as gso
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:26 AM <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com> wrote:
>
> From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
>
> Some of the locally generated frames marked as GSO which
> arrive at virtio_net_hdr_from_skb() have no GSO_TYPE, no
> fragments (data_len = 0) and length significantly shorter
> than the MTU (752 in my experiments).
Do we understand how these packets are generated? Else it seems this
might be papering over a deeper problem.
The stack should not create GSO packets less than or equal to
skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size. See for instance the check in
tcp_gso_segment after pulling the tcp header:
mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
goto out;
What is the gso_type, and does it include SKB_GSO_DODGY?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists