netdev - Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: add braces around macro arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200225003016.GA360989@f3>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 09:30:16 +0900
From:   Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To:     Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
Cc:     Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com,
        gregkh@...xfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: qlge: add braces around macro arguments

On 2020/02/24 13:22 +0530, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > On 2020/02/22 01:26 +0530, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> > > Fix checkpatch.pl warnings of adding braces around macro arguments to
> > > prevent precedence issues by adding braces in qlge_dbg.c
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> > > index 8cf39615c520..c7af2548d119 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_dbg.c
> > > @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ void ql_dump_regs(struct ql_adapter *qdev)
> > >  #ifdef QL_STAT_DUMP
> > >  
> > >  #define DUMP_STAT(qdev, stat)	\
> > > -	pr_err("%s = %ld\n", #stat, (unsigned long)qdev->nic_stats.stat)
> > > +	pr_err("%s = %ld\n", #stat, (unsigned long)(qdev)->nic_stats.stat)
> > >  
> > >  void ql_dump_stat(struct ql_adapter *qdev)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1578,12 +1578,12 @@ void ql_dump_stat(struct ql_adapter *qdev)
> > >  #ifdef QL_DEV_DUMP
> > >  
> > >  #define DUMP_QDEV_FIELD(qdev, type, field)		\
> > > -	pr_err("qdev->%-24s = " type "\n", #field, qdev->field)
> > > +	pr_err("qdev->%-24s = " type "\n", #field, (qdev)->(field))
> > >  #define DUMP_QDEV_DMA_FIELD(qdev, field)		\
> > >  	pr_err("qdev->%-24s = %llx\n", #field, (unsigned long long)qdev->field)
> >                                                                    ^^^^
> > You missed one.
> 
> It makes the line characaters greater than 80. Shall I still add braces?
> I mean it's better that I add them to prevent precedence issues, but it
> adds another warning, hence I wasn't sure.

Generally speaking, it's ok to spread the macro body onto multiple
lines.
In this case, it would be better to replace this printk format type with
"%pad". See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst