[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200226182506.GG25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:25:06 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@...inx.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: phylink: propagate resolved link
config via mac_link_up()
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:22:39PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 20:21, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 15:36, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > dpaa2 is complicated by the firmware, and that we can't switch the
> > > interface mode between (SGMII,1000base-X) and 10G.
> > >
> > > If the firmware is in "DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY" mode, it expects to be told
> > > the current link parameters via the dpmac_set_link_state() call - it
> > > isn't clear whether that needs to be called for other modes with the
> > > up/down state (firmware API documentation is poor.)
> > >
> >
> > With PCS control in Linux, I am pretty sure that you don't want
> > anything other than DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY anyway.
> > Basically in DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_FIXED, the MC firmware is in control of
> > the PCS and polls its link state to emit link notifications to objects
> > connected to the DPMAC. So Linux control of PCS would class with
>
> s/class/clash/
>
> > firmware control of the PCS, leading to undesirable side-effects to
> > say the least.
Yes, which is why we only register the PCS with phylink if we're in
DPMAC_LINK_TYPE_PHY mode.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists