[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e03d821b-1cf1-646d-2582-58ebbf00cf50@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:30:05 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net: switchdev: do not propagate bridge
updates across bridges
On 2/26/20 9:14 AM, Russell King wrote:
> When configuring a tree of independent bridges, propagating changes
> from the upper bridge across a bridge master to the lower bridge
> ports brings surprises.
>
> For example, a lower bridge may have vlan filtering enabled. It
> may have a vlan interface attached to the bridge master, which may
> then be incorporated into another bridge. As soon as the lower
> bridge vlan interface is attached to the upper bridge, the lower
> bridge has vlan filtering disabled.
>
> This occurs because switchdev recursively applies its changes to
> all lower devices no matter what.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Tested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists