[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzabauCm6Z+=EM46=xkAtGxPdLs3H7PhDnJNtrcH-4-iGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 20:35:16 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Forrest Chen <forrest0579@...il.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Petar Penkov <ppenkov.kernel@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add selftest for
get_netns_id helper
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:20 PM Forrest Chen <forrest0579@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Got it. So I think we could first merge this and refactor the tcpbpf test(or maybe also some other tests) in another thread, is that ok with you?
Sure, as long as there is a follow up.
Also, please make sure to reply inline.
>
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> 于2020年2月26日周三 上午1:13写道:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:20 PM Forrest Chen <forrest0579@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > It would be nice if this selftests becomes part of test_progs.
>> >
>> > You mean the whole tests of tcpbpf or only the changes I made in this test?
>> > If you mean the whole tests of tcpbpf, I think we could fire another thread
>> > to do this?
>>
>> Yeah, I meant entire tcpbpf test.
>>
>> >
>> > Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> 于2020年2月25日周二 下午2:13写道:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:47 PM Lingpeng Chen <forrest0579@...il.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > adding selftest for new bpf helper function get_netns_id
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Lingpeng Chen <forrest0579@...il.com>
>> >> > Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>> >> > ---
>> >>
>> >> It would be nice if this selftests becomes part of test_progs. That
>> >> way it would be exercised regularly, both by committers, as well as by
>> >> automated CI in libbpf's Github repo. Using global variables and BPF
>> >> skeleton would also clean up both BPF and user-space code.
>> >>
>> >> It seems like this test runs Python script for server, but doesn't
>> >> seem like that server is doing anything complicated, so writing that
>> >> in C shouldn't be a problem as well. Thoughts?
>> >>
>> >> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c | 11 +++++
>> >> > .../testing/selftests/bpf/test_tcpbpf_user.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> >> > 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >> >
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists