netdev - [net-next 01/16] net/mlx5e: Define one flow for TXQ selection when TCs are configured

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200226011246.70129-2-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:12:31 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 01/16] net/mlx5e: Define one flow for TXQ selection when TCs are configured

From: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>

We shall always extract channel index out of the txq, regardless
of the relation between txq_ix and num channels. The extraction is
always valid, as if txq is smaller than number of channels,
txq_ix == priv->txq2sq[txq_ix]->ch_ix.

By doing so, we can remove an if clause from the select queue method,
and have one flow for all packets.

Signed-off-by: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
index ee60383adc5b..fd6b2a1898c5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ u16 mlx5e_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 {
 	int txq_ix = netdev_pick_tx(dev, skb, NULL);
 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
-	u16 num_channels;
 	int up = 0;
+	int ch_ix;
 
 	if (!netdev_get_num_tc(dev))
 		return txq_ix;
@@ -86,14 +86,13 @@ u16 mlx5e_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb))
 			up = skb_vlan_tag_get_prio(skb);
 
-	/* txq_ix can be larger than num_channels since
-	 * dev->num_real_tx_queues = num_channels * num_tc
+	/* Normalize any picked txq_ix to [0, num_channels),
+	 * So we can return a txq_ix that matches the channel and
+	 * packet UP.
 	 */
-	num_channels = priv->channels.params.num_channels;
-	if (txq_ix >= num_channels)
-		txq_ix = priv->txq2sq[txq_ix]->ch_ix;
+	ch_ix = priv->txq2sq[txq_ix]->ch_ix;
 
-	return priv->channel_tc2realtxq[txq_ix][up];
+	return priv->channel_tc2realtxq[ch_ix][up];
 }
 
 static inline int mlx5e_skb_l2_header_offset(struct sk_buff *skb)
-- 
2.24.1