[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3a47cb1-a320-cc2f-d0ea-afa64c590d33@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:43:49 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] unix: uses an atomic type for scm files
accounting
On 28.02.2020 16:45, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> So the scm_stat_{add,del} helper can be invoked with no
> additional lock held.
>
> This clean-up the code a bit and will make the next
> patch easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
> ---
> include/net/af_unix.h | 2 +-
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 21 ++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
> index 17e10fba2152..5cb65227b7a9 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_unix.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct unix_skb_parms {
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> struct scm_stat {
> - u32 nr_fds;
> + atomic_t nr_fds;
> };
>
> #define UNIXCB(skb) (*(struct unix_skb_parms *)&((skb)->cb))
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index cbd7dc01e147..145a3965341e 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ static void unix_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct socket *sock)
>
> if (sk) {
> u = unix_sk(sock->sk);
> - seq_printf(m, "scm_fds: %u\n", READ_ONCE(u->scm_stat.nr_fds));
> + seq_printf(m, "scm_fds: %u\n",
> + atomic_read(&u->scm_stat.nr_fds));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1598,10 +1599,8 @@ static void scm_stat_add(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct scm_fp_list *fp = UNIXCB(skb).fp;
> struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> -
> if (unlikely(fp && fp->count))
> - u->scm_stat.nr_fds += fp->count;
> + atomic_add(fp->count, &u->scm_stat.nr_fds);
> }
>
> static void scm_stat_del(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> @@ -1609,10 +1608,8 @@ static void scm_stat_del(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct scm_fp_list *fp = UNIXCB(skb).fp;
> struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> -
> if (unlikely(fp && fp->count))
> - u->scm_stat.nr_fds -= fp->count;
> + atomic_sub(fp->count, &u->scm_stat.nr_fds);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1801,10 +1798,8 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> if (sock_flag(other, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP))
> __net_timestamp(skb);
> maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
> - spin_lock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> scm_stat_add(other, skb);
> - __skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> - spin_unlock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> + skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> unix_state_unlock(other);
> other->sk_data_ready(other);
> sock_put(other);
> @@ -1906,10 +1901,8 @@ static int unix_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> goto pipe_err_free;
>
> maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
> - spin_lock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> scm_stat_add(other, skb);
> - __skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> - spin_unlock(&other->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> + skb_queue_tail(&other->sk_receive_queue, skb);
> unix_state_unlock(other);
> other->sk_data_ready(other);
> sent += size;
> @@ -2405,9 +2398,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
> sk_peek_offset_bwd(sk, chunk);
>
> if (UNIXCB(skb).fp) {
> - spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> scm_stat_del(sk, skb);
> - spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> unix_detach_fds(&scm, skb);
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists