netdev - Re: Re: Re: possible deadlock in cma_netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200228164952.GV31668@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 12:49:52 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+55de90ab5f44172b0c90@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        chuck.lever@...cle.com, dledford@...hat.com, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, parav@...lanox.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: possible deadlock in cma_netdev_callback

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:42:02PM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote:

> Well, right, marking a socket via setsockopt SO_BINDTODEVICE
> does not work - I get -EPERM. Maybe works only from user land
> since the ifname gets copied in from there.
> 
> What I tested as working is nailing the scope of wildcard
> listen via:
> s->sk->sk_bound_dev_if = netdev->ifindex;

That sounds potentially right
 
> I am not sure what is the right way of limiting the scope
> of a socket to one interface in kernel mode. Is above line
> the way to go, or do I miss an interface to do such things?
> Anybody could help?

I didn't find an alternative, but not a lot of places touching this
outside the implementators of a socket type.
 
Jason