[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSfd80pZroxtqZDsTeEz4FaronC=pdgjeaBBfYqqi5HiyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:53:27 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@...gle.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hawk@...nel.org,
"Jubran, Samih" <sameehj@...zon.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netdev attribute to control xdpgeneric skb linearization
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:01 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 02:54:35 -0800 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Add a netdevice flag to control skb linearization in generic xdp mode.
> >
> > The attribute can be modified through
> > /sys/class/net/<DEVICE>/xdpgeneric_linearize
> > The default is 1 (on)
> >
> > Motivation: xdp expects linear skbs with some minimum headroom, and
> > generic xdp calls skb_linearize() if needed. The linearization is
> > expensive, and may be unnecessary e.g. when the xdp program does
> > not need access to the whole payload.
> > This sysfs entry allows users to opt out of linearization on a
> > per-device basis (linearization is still performed on cloned skbs).
> >
> > On a kernel instrumented to grab timestamps around the linearization
> > code in netif_receive_generic_xdp, and heavy netperf traffic with 1500b
> > mtu, I see the following times (nanoseconds/pkt)
> >
> > The receiver generally sees larger packets so the difference is more
> > significant.
> >
> > ns/pkt RECEIVER SENDER
> >
> > p50 p90 p99 p50 p90 p99
> >
> > LINEARIZATION: 600ns 1090ns 4900ns 149ns 249ns 460ns
> > NO LINEARIZATION: 40ns 59ns 90ns 40ns 50ns 100ns
> >
> > v1 --> v2 : added Documentation
> > v2 --> v3 : adjusted for skb_cloned
> > v3 --> v4 : renamed to xdpgeneric_linearize, documentation
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@...gle.com>
>
> Just load your program in cls_bpf. No extensions or knobs needed.
>
> Making xdpgeneric-only extensions without touching native XDP makes
> no sense to me. Is this part of some greater vision?
Yes, native xdp has the same issue when handling packets that exceed a
page (4K+ MTU) or otherwise consist of multiple segments. The issue is
just more acute in generic xdp. But agreed that both need to be solved
together.
Many programs need only access to the header. There currently is not a
way to express this, or for xdp to convey that the buffer covers only
part of the packet.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists