[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12a9a9bb-12ca-7cfa-43f1-ade9d13b9651@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 11:29:44 -0800
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, valex@...lanox.com, linyunsheng@...wei.com,
lihong.yang@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/22] ice: enable initial devlink support
On 3/2/2020 8:30 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:22:03AM CET, jacob.e.keller@...el.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> +int ice_devlink_create_port(struct ice_pf *pf)
>> +{
>> + struct devlink *devlink = priv_to_devlink(pf);
>> + struct ice_vsi *vsi = ice_get_main_vsi(pf);
>> + struct device *dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!vsi) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "%s: unable to find main VSI\n", __func__);
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + devlink_port_attrs_set(&pf->devlink_port, DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL,
>> + pf->hw.pf_id, false, 0, NULL, 0);
>> + err = devlink_port_register(devlink, &pf->devlink_port, pf->hw.pf_id);
>> + if (err) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "devlink_port_register failed: %d\n", err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>
> You need to register_netdev here. Otherwise you'll get inconsistent udev
> naming.
>
The netdev is registered in other portion of the code, and should
already be registered by the time we call ice_devlink_create_port. This
check is mostly here to prevent a NULL pointer if the VSI somehow
doesn't have a netdev associated with it.
>
>> + if (vsi->netdev)
>> + devlink_port_type_eth_set(&pf->devlink_port, vsi->netdev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
>
> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists