[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200302205847.GA18593@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:58:47 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Derek Chickles <dchickles@...vell.com>,
Satanand Burla <sburla@...vell.com>,
Felix Manlunas <fmanlunas@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH][next] liquidio: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_console.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_console.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_console.c
index dfc77507b159..d0d581e98734 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_console.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/octeon_console.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct octeon_pci_console_desc {
u32 pad;
/* must be 64 bit aligned here... */
/* Array of addresses of octeon_pci_console structures */
- u64 console_addr_array[0];
+ u64 console_addr_array[];
/* Implicit storage for console_addr_array */
};
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists