lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Mar 2020 16:30:53 +0200
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...lanox.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] net/sched: act_ct: Software offload of
 established flows

On 03/03/2020 16:21, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Offload nf conntrack processing by looking up the 5-tuple in the
> zone's flow table.
> 
> The nf conntrack module will process the packets until a connection is
> in established state. Once in established state, the ct state pointer
> (nf_conn) will be restored on the skb from a successful ft lookup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>   v4->v5:
>    Re-read ip/ip6 header after pulling as skb ptrs may change
>    Use pskb_network_may_pull instaed of pskb_may_pull
>   v1->v2:
>    Add !skip_add curly braces
>    Removed extra setting thoff again
>    Check tcp proto outside of tcf_ct_flow_table_check_tcp
> 
>  net/sched/act_ct.c | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 160 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Paul,
Thanks for making the changes, I have two more questions below, missed these changes
on my previous review, sorry about that.

> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index 2ab38431..5aff5e7 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,157 @@ static void tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn(struct tcf_ct_flow_table *ct_ft,
>  	tcf_ct_flow_table_add(ct_ft, ct, tcp);
>  }
>  
> +static bool
> +tcf_ct_flow_table_fill_tuple_ipv4(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				  struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple)
> +{
> +	struct flow_ports *ports;
> +	unsigned int thoff;
> +	struct iphdr *iph;
> +
> +	if (!pskb_network_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*iph)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> +	thoff = iph->ihl * 4;
> +
> +	if (ip_is_fragment(iph) ||
> +	    unlikely(thoff != sizeof(struct iphdr)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP &&
> +	    iph->protocol != IPPROTO_UDP)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (iph->ttl <= 1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!pskb_network_may_pull(skb, thoff + sizeof(*ports)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> +	ports = (struct flow_ports *)(skb_network_header(skb) + thoff);
> +
> +	tuple->src_v4.s_addr = iph->saddr;
> +	tuple->dst_v4.s_addr = iph->daddr;
> +	tuple->src_port = ports->source;
> +	tuple->dst_port = ports->dest;
> +	tuple->l3proto = AF_INET;
> +	tuple->l4proto = iph->protocol;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool
> +tcf_ct_flow_table_fill_tuple_ipv6(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				  struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple)
> +{
> +	struct flow_ports *ports;
> +	struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
> +	unsigned int thoff;
> +
> +	if (!pskb_network_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*ip6h)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	ip6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> +
> +	if (ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_TCP &&
> +	    ip6h->nexthdr != IPPROTO_UDP)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (ip6h->hop_limit <= 1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	thoff = sizeof(*ip6h);
> +	if (!pskb_network_may_pull(skb, thoff + sizeof(*ports)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	ip6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> +	ports = (struct flow_ports *)(skb_network_header(skb) + thoff);
> +
> +	tuple->src_v6 = ip6h->saddr;
> +	tuple->dst_v6 = ip6h->daddr;
> +	tuple->src_port = ports->source;
> +	tuple->dst_port = ports->dest;
> +	tuple->l3proto = AF_INET6;
> +	tuple->l4proto = ip6h->nexthdr;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool tcf_ct_flow_table_check_tcp(struct flow_offload *flow,
> +					struct sk_buff *skb,
> +					unsigned int thoff)
> +{
> +	struct tcphdr *tcph;
> +
> +	if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, thoff + sizeof(*tcph)))

Sorry, I missed this spot in my previous review, but shouldn't this follow the
same logic for the pull ?

> +		return false;
> +
> +	tcph = (void *)(skb_network_header(skb) + thoff);
> +	if (unlikely(tcph->fin || tcph->rst)) {
> +		flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool tcf_ct_flow_table_lookup(struct tcf_ct_params *p,
> +				     struct sk_buff *skb,
> +				     u8 family)
> +{
> +	struct nf_flowtable *nf_ft = &p->ct_ft->nf_ft;
> +	struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *tuplehash;
> +	struct flow_offload_tuple tuple = {};
> +	enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
> +	struct flow_offload *flow;
> +	struct nf_conn *ct;
> +	unsigned int thoff;
> +	int ip_proto;
> +	u8 dir;
> +
> +	/* Previously seen or loopback */
> +	ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
> +	if ((ct && !nf_ct_is_template(ct)) || ctinfo == IP_CT_UNTRACKED)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	switch (family) {
> +	case NFPROTO_IPV4:
> +		if (!tcf_ct_flow_table_fill_tuple_ipv4(skb, &tuple))
> +			return false;
> +		break;
> +	case NFPROTO_IPV6:
> +		if (!tcf_ct_flow_table_fill_tuple_ipv6(skb, &tuple))
> +			return false;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	tuplehash = flow_offload_lookup(nf_ft, &tuple);
> +	if (!tuplehash)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
> +	flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> +	ct = flow->ct;
> +
> +	ctinfo = dir == FLOW_OFFLOAD_DIR_ORIGINAL ? IP_CT_ESTABLISHED :
> +						    IP_CT_ESTABLISHED_REPLY;
> +
> +	thoff = ip_hdr(skb)->ihl * 4;
> +	ip_proto = ip_hdr(skb)->protocol;

I'm a bit confused about this part, above you treat the skb based on the family
but down here it's always IPv4 ?

> +	if (ip_proto == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> +	    !tcf_ct_flow_table_check_tcp(flow, skb, thoff))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
> +	nf_ct_set(skb, ct, ctinfo);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int tcf_ct_flow_tables_init(void)
>  {
>  	return rhashtable_init(&zones_ht, &zones_params);
> @@ -554,6 +705,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>  	struct nf_hook_state state;
>  	int nh_ofs, err, retval;
>  	struct tcf_ct_params *p;
> +	bool skip_add = false;
>  	struct nf_conn *ct;
>  	u8 family;
>  
> @@ -603,6 +755,11 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>  	 */
>  	cached = tcf_ct_skb_nfct_cached(net, skb, p->zone, force);
>  	if (!cached) {
> +		if (!commit && tcf_ct_flow_table_lookup(p, skb, family)) {
> +			skip_add = true;
> +			goto do_nat;
> +		}
> +
>  		/* Associate skb with specified zone. */
>  		if (tmpl) {
>  			ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
> @@ -620,6 +777,7 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>  			goto out_push;
>  	}
>  
> +do_nat:
>  	ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
>  	if (!ct)
>  		goto out_push;
> @@ -637,10 +795,10 @@ static int tcf_ct_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>  		 * even if the connection is already confirmed.
>  		 */
>  		nf_conntrack_confirm(skb);
> +	} else if (!skip_add) {
> +		tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn(p->ct_ft, ct, ctinfo);
>  	}
>  
> -	tcf_ct_flow_table_process_conn(p->ct_ft, ct, ctinfo);
> -
>  out_push:
>  	skb_push_rcsum(skb, nh_ofs);
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ