netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: test new __sk_buff field gso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  3 Mar 2020 15:05:03 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: test new __sk_buff field gso_size

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59
("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field").

Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c        |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c        |  2 +
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c  | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
index c6d6b685a946..4538bd08203f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/skb_ctx.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ void test_skb_ctx(void)
 		.wire_len = 100,
 		.gso_segs = 8,
 		.mark = 9,
+		.gso_size = 10,
 	};
 	struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
 		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
index 202de3938494..b02ea589ce7e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_skb_ctx.c
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ int process(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 		return 1;
 	if (skb->gso_segs != 8)
 		return 1;
+	if (skb->gso_size != 10)
+		return 1;
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
index d438193804b2..2e16b8e268f2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_skb.c
@@ -1010,6 +1010,53 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 },
+{
+	"read gso_size from CGROUP_SKB",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_size)),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+},
+{
+	"read gso_size from CGROUP_SKB",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_size)),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+},
+{
+	"write gso_size from CGROUP_SKB",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_size)),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access off=176 size=4",
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+},
+{
+	"read gso_size from CLS",
+	.insns = {
+	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, gso_size)),
+	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+},
 {
 	"check wire_len is not readable by sockets",
 	.insns = {
-- 
2.25.0.265.gbab2e86ba0-goog