netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/12] bpf: sockmap: simplify sock_map_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200304101318.5225-7-lmb@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Wed,  4 Mar 2020 11:13:11 +0100
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To:     john.fastabend@...il.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel-team@...udflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/12] bpf: sockmap: simplify sock_map_init_proto

We can take advantage of the fact that both callers of
sock_map_init_proto are holding a RCU read lock, and
have verified that psock is valid.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
---
 net/core/sock_map.c | 19 ++++---------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index 9898294e119d..83c5082cefd3 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -141,28 +141,17 @@ static void sock_map_unref(struct sock *sk, void *link_raw)
 	}
 }
 
-static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk)
+static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
 {
-	struct sk_psock *psock;
 	struct proto *prot;
 
 	sock_owned_by_me(sk);
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	psock = sk_psock(sk);
-	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	prot = tcp_bpf_get_proto(sk, psock);
-	if (IS_ERR(prot)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
+	if (IS_ERR(prot))
 		return PTR_ERR(prot);
-	}
 
 	sk_psock_update_proto(sk, psock, prot);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -241,7 +230,7 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sk_psock_progs *progs,
 	if (msg_parser)
 		psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.msg_parser, msg_parser);
 
-	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_drop;
 
@@ -286,7 +275,7 @@ static int sock_map_link_no_progs(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
 	if (!psock)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+	ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.20.1