netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] riscv, bpf: add RV32G eBPF JIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNjkMe2kM3V+jytmSbwoN6wnBXGGTknsEeS7EV314eG+Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:31:29 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To:     Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] riscv, bpf: add RV32G eBPF JIT

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 08:24, Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu> wrote:
>
> > I like that, but keep the first patch as a refactoring patch only, and
> > then in a *new* patch 2 you add the rv32 specific code (sltu and
> > pseudo instructions + the xlen preprocessor check + copyright-things
> > ;-)).  Patch 3 will be the old patch 2. Wdyt?
>
> Thanks! I'll make sure that patch 1 is for renaming bpf_jit_comp.c
> and factoring code out. Do you think it's reasonable to add the
> RV32-specific code to the header in the same patch that adds the
> RV32 JIT implementation (patch 2)? It might make sense to commit
> them together.
>
> The full plan for v5 would be:
>
> Patch 1
>
> - Refactor existing code to bpf_jit.h and bpf_jit_core.c
>   + Including the minor modifications to build_body() and
>   bpf_int_jit_compile() (These are unrelated to RV32 and we could
>   forego these tweaks).
>   + Also making emit_insn and build_{prologue,epilogue} non-static
>   and renaming them to be prefixed with "bpf_jit_".
> - Rename bpf_jit_comp.c to bpf_jit_comp64.c
>
> Patch 2
>
> - Add the RV32 BPF JIT implementation to bpf_jit_comp32.c and
> RV32-specific changes to bpf_jit.h.
>
> Patch 3
>
> - Update documentation.
>
> Patch 4
>
> - Update MAINTAINERS.
>
> Thanks again,
>

Perfect! Thank you!


> Luke