lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:38:42 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <>
To:     KP Singh <>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <>,
        Stephen Rothwell <>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        "" <>,
        bpf <>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 5 (bpf_trace)

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:32 AM KP Singh <> wrote:
> This fails as we added bpf_test_run_tracing in net/bpf/test_run.c
> which gets built only CONFIG_NET is enabled. Which, this particular
> config, disables.
> Alexei, if it's okay with you. I can send a patch that separates the
> tracing test code into kernel/bpf/test_run_trace.c which depends

In such situation we typically add __weak dummy call.
May be split will work too.
or move tracing_prog_ops to kernel/bpf/core.c ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists