netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] eBPF JIT for RV32G

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d95a83aa-d91c-6e5f-b9ec-0de0af23770a@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:46:58 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc:     Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/4] eBPF JIT for RV32G

On 3/5/20 5:53 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 16:19, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>>
> [...]
>> Applied, thanks everyone!
>>
>> P.s.: I fixed the MAINTAINERS entry in the last one to have both netdev and bpf
>> to be consistent with all the other JIT entries there.
> 
> Ah, I asked specifically Xi and Luke to *remove* the netdev entry, due
> to the bpf_devel_QA.rst change. :-)

Ah right, although all the BPF entries in MAINTAINERS file have both lists
mentioned today. I think it doesn't hurt to have potentially more eyes for
reviews.

Thanks,
Daniel