[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200305172245.37a4b3d2@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 17:22:45 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
"Tieman, Henry W" <henry.w.tieman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 05/16] ice: Add support for tunnel offloads
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 01:08:45 +0000 Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> > > + status = ice_create_tunnel(&pf->hw, tnl_type, port);
> > > + if (status == ICE_ERR_ALREADY_EXISTS)
> > > + dev_dbg(ice_pf_to_dev(pf), "port %d already exists in
> > > UDP tunnels list\n",
> > > + port);
> > > + else if (status == ICE_ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE)
> > > + netdev_err(netdev, "Max tunneled UDP ports reached,
> > > port %d not added\n",
> > > + port);
> >
> > error is probably a little much for resource exhaustion since it's
> > not
> > going to cause any problem other than a slow down?
>
> Correct, just a slow down. A warning then or did you prefer a dbg?
No preference.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists