[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200305.173413.1141876751815244581.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 17:34:13 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jianglidong@...il.com
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jianglidong3@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: ignore peer tx_dropped when counting local
rx_dropped
From: Lidong Jiang <jianglidong@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:49:29 +0800
> From: Jiang Lidong <jianglidong3@...com>
>
> When local NET_RX backlog is full due to traffic overrun,
> peer veth tx_dropped counter increases. At that time, list
> local veth stats, rx_dropped has double value of peer
> tx_dropped, even bigger than transmit packets by peer.
>
> In NET_RX softirq process, if any packet drop case happens,
> it increases dev's rx_dropped counter and returns NET_RX_DROP.
>
> At veth tx side, it records any error returned from peer netif_rx
> into local dev tx_dropped counter.
>
> In veth get stats process, it puts local dev rx_dropped and
> peer dev tx_dropped into together as local rx_drpped value.
> So that it shows double value of real dropped packets number in
> this case.
>
> This patch ignores peer tx_dropped when counting local rx_dropped,
> since peer tx_dropped is duplicated to local rx_dropped at most cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Lidong <jianglidong3@...com>
This makes sense to me, applied, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists