netdev - Re: [pull request][net 0/5] Mellanox, mlx5 fixes 2020-03-05

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f2e3fb5789270a6106510138211e5c17f3c7ad7.camel@mellanox.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Mar 2020 00:52:24 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pull request][net 0/5] Mellanox, mlx5 fixes 2020-03-05

On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:56 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu,  5 Mar 2020 15:17:34 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > This series introduces some fixes to mlx5 driver.
> > 
> > Please pull and let me know if there is any problem.
> > 
> > For -stable v5.3
> >  ('net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix wrong value in record tracker enum')
> 
> Back porting dead code feels kinda weird :S
> 

Yes this one can be skipped.

I have an automatic system that already tries to backport and test the
patch to find the correct -stable to mark, and this time I didn't
double check manually if the patch is actually needed to be backported
.. my bad.

> > For -stable v5.4
> >  ('net/mlx5: DR, Fix postsend actions write length')
> > 
> > For -stable v5.5
> >  ('net/mlx5e: kTLS, Fix TCP seq off-by-1 issue in TX resync flow')
> >  ('net/mlx5e: Fix endianness handling in pedit mask')
> 
> I can only trust your testing on the pedit change :)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

Thanks!