[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200307010408.65704-4-snelson@pensando.io>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:04:03 -0800
From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/8] ionic: improve irq numa locality
Spreading the interrupts across the CPU cores is good for load
balancing, but not necessarily as good when using a CPU/core
that is not part of the NUMA local CPU. If it can be localized,
the kernel's cpumask_local_spread() service will pick a core
that is on the node close to the PCI device.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
index 1b7e18fe83db..7df49b433ae5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_lif.c
@@ -424,8 +424,9 @@ static int ionic_qcq_alloc(struct ionic_lif *lif, unsigned int type,
ionic_intr_mask_assert(idev->intr_ctrl, new->intr.index,
IONIC_INTR_MASK_SET);
- new->intr.cpu = new->intr.index % num_online_cpus();
- if (cpu_online(new->intr.cpu))
+ new->intr.cpu = cpumask_local_spread(new->intr.index,
+ dev_to_node(dev));
+ if (new->intr.cpu != -1)
cpumask_set_cpu(new->intr.cpu,
&new->intr.affinity_mask);
} else {
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists