[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200308150107.GC11496@unreal>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:01:07 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
raspl@...ux.ibm.com, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/smc: cancel event worker during device removal
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:45:18PM +0100, Karsten Graul wrote:
> During IB device removal, cancel the event worker before the device
> structure is freed. In the worker, check if the device is being
> terminated and do not proceed with the event work in that case.
>
> Fixes: a4cf0443c414 ("smc: introduce SMC as an IB-client")
> Reported-by: syzbot+b297c6825752e7a07272@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/smc/smc_ib.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ib.c b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> index d6ba186f67e2..5e4e64a9aa4b 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,9 @@ static void smc_ib_port_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
> work, struct smc_ib_device, port_event_work);
> u8 port_idx;
>
> + if (list_empty(&smcibdev->list))
> + return;
> +
How can it be true if you are not holding "smc_ib_devices.lock" during
execution of smc_ib_port_event_work()?
> for_each_set_bit(port_idx, &smcibdev->port_event_mask, SMC_MAX_PORTS) {
> smc_ib_remember_port_attr(smcibdev, port_idx + 1);
> clear_bit(port_idx, &smcibdev->port_event_mask);
> @@ -582,6 +585,7 @@ static void smc_ib_remove_dev(struct ib_device *ibdev, void *client_data)
> smc_smcr_terminate_all(smcibdev);
> smc_ib_cleanup_per_ibdev(smcibdev);
> ib_unregister_event_handler(&smcibdev->event_handler);
> + cancel_work_sync(&smcibdev->port_event_work);
> kfree(smcibdev);
> }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists