[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28ec0ed4-38b6-bb27-d769-5bf9d1d4f09c@solarflare.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:46:57 +0000
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<saeedm@...lanox.com>, <leon@...nel.org>,
<michael.chan@...adcom.com>, <vishal@...lsio.com>,
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <idosch@...lanox.com>,
<aelior@...vell.com>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...com>, <jhs@...atatu.com>,
<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <pablo@...filter.org>,
<mlxsw@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 01/10] flow_offload: Introduce offload of HW
stats type
On 09/03/2020 17:34, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:52:16PM CET, ecree@...arflare.com wrote:
>> An enum type seems safer.
> Well, it's is a bitfield, how do you envision to implement it. Have enum
> value for every combination? I don't get it.
enum flow_action_stats_type {
FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_DISABLED=0,
FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_IMMEDIATE=BIT(0),
FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_DELAYED=BIT(1),
FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_ANY=(FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_IMMEDIATE |
FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_DELAYED),
};
It's not a requirement of the language for every value used withan
enumeration to be a defined enumerator value, so if someone ends up
putting (FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_FOO | FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_TYPE_BAR)
into (say) a driver that supports only FOO and BAR, that will work
just fine. I don't see what problem you expect to occur here.
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists