lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:33:25 +0100
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        ecree@...arflare.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] flow_offload: use flow_action_for_each in
 flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check()

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:44:47PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Instead of manually iterating over entries, use flow_action_for_each
> helper. Move the helper and wrap it to fit to 80 cols on the way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> ---
>  include/net/flow_offload.h | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> index 64807aa03cee..7b7bd9215156 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow_offload.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ static inline bool flow_offload_has_one_action(const struct flow_action *action)
>  	return action->num_entries == 1;
>  }
>  
> +#define flow_action_for_each(__i, __act, __actions)			\
> +        for (__i = 0, __act = &(__actions)->entries[0];			\
> +	     __i < (__actions)->num_entries;				\
> +	     __act = &(__actions)->entries[++__i])
> +
>  static inline bool
>  flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check(const struct flow_action *action,
>  				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -267,7 +272,7 @@ flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check(const struct flow_action *action,
>  	if (flow_offload_has_one_action(action))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < action->num_entries; i++) {
> +	flow_action_for_each(i, action_entry, action) {
>  		action_entry = &action->entries[i];
                ^^^

action_entry is set twice, right? One from flow_action_for_each() and
again here. You can probably remove this line too.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists