[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200309183325.yw2c4swbwv7xqlm2@salvia>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:33:25 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ecree@...arflare.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] flow_offload: use flow_action_for_each in
flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check()
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:44:47PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Instead of manually iterating over entries, use flow_action_for_each
> helper. Move the helper and wrap it to fit to 80 cols on the way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
> ---
> include/net/flow_offload.h | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/flow_offload.h b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> index 64807aa03cee..7b7bd9215156 100644
> --- a/include/net/flow_offload.h
> +++ b/include/net/flow_offload.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ static inline bool flow_offload_has_one_action(const struct flow_action *action)
> return action->num_entries == 1;
> }
>
> +#define flow_action_for_each(__i, __act, __actions) \
> + for (__i = 0, __act = &(__actions)->entries[0]; \
> + __i < (__actions)->num_entries; \
> + __act = &(__actions)->entries[++__i])
> +
> static inline bool
> flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check(const struct flow_action *action,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -267,7 +272,7 @@ flow_action_mixed_hw_stats_types_check(const struct flow_action *action,
> if (flow_offload_has_one_action(action))
> return true;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < action->num_entries; i++) {
> + flow_action_for_each(i, action_entry, action) {
> action_entry = &action->entries[i];
^^^
action_entry is set twice, right? One from flow_action_for_each() and
again here. You can probably remove this line too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists