lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:40:05 +0000
From:   Edward Cree <>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <>,
        Paul Blakey <>
CC:     Saeed Mahameed <>,
        Oz Shlomo <>,
        Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Vlad Buslov <>,
        David Miller <>,
        "" <>,
        Jiri Pirko <>, Roi Dayan <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next ct-offload v2 05/13] net/sched: act_ct: Enable
 hardware offload of flow table entires

On 09/03/2020 22:19, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 09:25:49PM +0000, Edward Cree wrote:
>> This doesn't seem to apply to net-next (34a568a244be); the label after
>>  the __module_get() is 'out_unlock', not 'take_ref'.  Is there a missing
>>  prerequisite patch?  Or am I just failing to drive 'git am' correctly?
> That's a mid-air collision with Eric's
> [PATCH net-next] net/sched: act_ct: fix lockdep splat in tcf_ct_flow_table_get
> That went in in between v1 and v2 here.
>   Marcelo
Unfortunately, although going back to that commit's parentmakes this
 patch apply, #6 still doesn't, and I don't particularly feel like
 playing whack-a-mole.  Paul, could you either specify the base from
 which you generated this series, or stick the branch somewhere that
 can be pulled from, please?  I'd like to build it so that I can
 start experimenting with driver code to interface with it.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists