netdev - RE: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Fixes for bpftool-prog-profile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:00:37 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quentin@...valent.com, kernel-team@...com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, arnaldo.melo@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Fixes for bpftool-prog-profile

Song Liu wrote:
> 1. Fix build for older clang;
> 2. Fix skeleton's dependency on libbpf.
> 
> Song Liu (2):
>   bpftool: only build bpftool-prog-profile with clang >= v11
>   bpftool: skeleton should depend on libbpf
> 
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/prog.c   |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.17.1

Maybe instead of "Please recompile" -> "Please build" sounds a bit better
to me but that is probably a matter of preference and doesn't matter much.

Anyways for the series,

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>