[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b6213e51131deacbdac29a8d9c088ae49933724.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:28:52 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] zd1211rw/zd_usb.h: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:21 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 3/10/20 5:15 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, it doesn't actually make a difference as
> > all the compilers produce the same object code with either form.
> >
>
> That's precisely why we can implement these changes, cleanly(the fact
> that the compiler produces the same object code). So, the resulting
> object code is not the point here.
You are making Jes' point.
There's nothing wrong with making changes just for consistent
style across the kernel.
This change is exactly that.
I have no objection to this patch.
Jes does, though Jes is not a maintainer of this file.
I think "churn" arguments are overstated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists