netdev - [net-next 06/11] net/mlx5: Allocate smaller size tables for ft offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  9 Mar 2020 18:42:41 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 06/11] net/mlx5: Allocate smaller size tables for ft offload

From: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>

Instead of giving ft tables one of the largest tables available - 4M,
give it a more reasonable size - 64k. Especially since it will
always be created as a miss hook in the following patch.

Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
 .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads_chains.c    | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads_chains.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads_chains.c
index d41e4f002b84..8bfa53ea5dd8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads_chains.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads_chains.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static const unsigned int ESW_POOLS[] = { 4 * 1024 * 1024,
 					  1 * 1024 * 1024,
 					  64 * 1024,
 					  128 };
+#define ESW_FT_TBL_SZ (64 * 1024)
 
 struct mlx5_esw_chains_priv {
 	struct rhashtable chains_ht;
@@ -201,7 +202,9 @@ mlx5_esw_chains_create_fdb_table(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 		ft_attr.flags |= (MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TUNNEL_EN_REFORMAT |
 				  MLX5_FLOW_TABLE_TUNNEL_EN_DECAP);
 
-	sz = mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, POOL_NEXT_SIZE);
+	sz = (chain == mlx5_esw_chains_get_ft_chain(esw)) ?
+	     mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, ESW_FT_TBL_SZ) :
+	     mlx5_esw_chains_get_avail_sz_from_pool(esw, POOL_NEXT_SIZE);
 	if (!sz)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
 	ft_attr.max_fte = sz;
-- 
2.24.1