lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:56:32 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/15] ethtool: set netdev features with
 FEATURES_SET request

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:40:28 +0100 (CET) Michal Kubecek wrote:
> +	if (!(req_info.flags & ETHTOOL_FLAG_OMIT_REPLY)) {
> +		bool compact = req_info.flags & ETHTOOL_FLAG_COMPACT_BITSETS;

is req_info->flags validated anywhere to make sure users get an error
when they set a bit unrecognized by the kernel? :S

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ