lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzYG5f70jYfTWdDdAS_ok4Bj8xJYz-x=zM1ppfRcer3=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:55:14 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     "Daniel T. Lee" <danieltimlee@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] samples: bpf: refactor perf_event user
 program with libbpf bpf_link

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:27 PM Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The bpf_program__attach of libbpf(using bpf_link) is much more intuitive
> than the previous method using ioctl.
>
> bpf_program__attach_perf_event manages the enable of perf_event and
> attach of BPF programs to it, so there's no neeed to do this
> directly with ioctl.
>
> In addition, bpf_link provides consistency in the use of API because it
> allows disable (detach, destroy) for multiple events to be treated as
> one bpf_link__destroy.
>
> This commit refactors samples that attach the bpf program to perf_event
> by using libbbpf instead of ioctl. Also the bpf_load in the samples were
> removed and migrated to use libbbpf API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <danieltimlee@...il.com>
> ---

Daniel, thanks for this clean up! It's good to see samples be
modernized a bit :)

> Changes in v2:
>  - check memory allocation is successful
>  - clean up allocated memory on error
>
>  samples/bpf/Makefile           |  4 +-
>  samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c    | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index ff0061467dd3..424f6fe7ce38 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ xdp2-objs := xdp1_user.o
>  xdp_router_ipv4-objs := xdp_router_ipv4_user.o
>  test_current_task_under_cgroup-objs := bpf_load.o $(CGROUP_HELPERS) \
>                                        test_current_task_under_cgroup_user.o
> -trace_event-objs := bpf_load.o trace_event_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
> -sampleip-objs := bpf_load.o sampleip_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
> +trace_event-objs := trace_event_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
> +sampleip-objs := sampleip_user.o $(TRACE_HELPERS)
>  tc_l2_redirect-objs := bpf_load.o tc_l2_redirect_user.o
>  lwt_len_hist-objs := bpf_load.o lwt_len_hist_user.o
>  xdp_tx_iptunnel-objs := xdp_tx_iptunnel_user.o
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> index b0f115f938bc..fd763a49c913 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sampleip_user.c
> @@ -10,13 +10,11 @@
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <signal.h>
>  #include <string.h>
> -#include <assert.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/ptrace.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> -#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> -#include "bpf_load.h"
>  #include "perf-sys.h"
>  #include "trace_helpers.h"
>
> @@ -25,6 +23,7 @@
>  #define MAX_IPS                8192
>  #define PAGE_OFFSET    0xffff880000000000
>
> +static int map_fd;
>  static int nr_cpus;
>
>  static void usage(void)
> @@ -34,7 +33,8 @@ static void usage(void)
>         printf("       duration   # sampling duration (seconds), default 5\n");
>  }
>
> -static int sampling_start(int *pmu_fd, int freq)
> +static int sampling_start(int *pmu_fd, int freq, struct bpf_program *prog,
> +                         struct bpf_link **link)

It's not apparent from looking at struct bpf_link **link whether it's
an output parameter (so sampling_start is supposed to assign *single*
link to return it to calling function) or it's an array of pointers.
Seems like it's the latter, so I'd prefer this written as

struct bpf_link *links[] (notice also plural name).

Please consider this.

>  {
>         int i;
>
> @@ -53,20 +53,22 @@ static int sampling_start(int *pmu_fd, int freq)
>                         fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Initializing perf sampling\n");
>                         return 1;
>                 }
> -               assert(ioctl(pmu_fd[i], PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF,
> -                            prog_fd[0]) == 0);
> -               assert(ioctl(pmu_fd[i], PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0) == 0);
> +               link[i] = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(prog, pmu_fd[i]);
> +               if (link[i] < 0) {

link is a pointer, < 0 doesn't make sense and is always going to be
false on x86. Use IS_ERR(link[i]). It's also a good idea to set it to
NULL, if link creation failed to prevent accidental
bpf_link__destroy(link[i]) later on, trying to free bogus pointer.

> +                       fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Attach perf event\n");
> +                       return 1;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -static void sampling_end(int *pmu_fd)
> +static void sampling_end(struct bpf_link **link)

same as above, struct bpf_link *links[] would be much better here, IMO.

>  {
>         int i;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++)
> -               close(pmu_fd[i]);
> +               bpf_link__destroy(link[i]);
>  }
>
>  struct ipcount {
> @@ -128,14 +130,18 @@ static void print_ip_map(int fd)
>  static void int_exit(int sig)
>  {
>         printf("\n");
> -       print_ip_map(map_fd[0]);
> +       print_ip_map(map_fd);
>         exit(0);
>  }
>
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
> +       int prog_fd, *pmu_fd, opt, freq = DEFAULT_FREQ, secs = DEFAULT_SECS;
> +       struct bpf_program *prog;
> +       struct bpf_object *obj;
> +       struct bpf_link **link;
>         char filename[256];
> -       int *pmu_fd, opt, freq = DEFAULT_FREQ, secs = DEFAULT_SECS;
> +       int error = 0;
>
>         /* process arguments */
>         while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "F:h")) != -1) {
> @@ -165,36 +171,54 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>         /* create perf FDs for each CPU */
>         nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);

While neither approach is ideal, using number of online CPUs
(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) will probably work in slightly more cases
(there are machines configured with, say, 256 possible CPUs, but only
32 available, for instance).


>         pmu_fd = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(int));

similar naming nit: pmu_fds?

> -       if (pmu_fd == NULL) {
> -               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: malloc of pmu_fd\n");
> -               return 1;
> +       link = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(struct bpf_link *));

Use calloc() to have those links initialized to NULL automatically.
Makes clean up so much easier.

> +       if (pmu_fd == NULL || link == NULL) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: malloc of pmu_fd/link\n");
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto cleanup;
>         }
>
>         /* load BPF program */
>         snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
> -       if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
> +       if (bpf_prog_load(filename, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, &obj, &prog_fd)) {

Using skeleton would be best, but it's probably more appropriate for
another patch to integrate skeleton generation with samples/bpf. So
the next one would be bpf_object__open_file(), instead of legacy
bpf_prog_load().

>                 fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: loading BPF program (errno %d):\n",
>                         errno);
> -               if (strcmp(bpf_log_buf, "") == 0)
> -                       fprintf(stderr, "Try: ulimit -l unlimited\n");
> -               else
> -                       fprintf(stderr, "%s", bpf_log_buf);
> -               return 1;
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto cleanup;
> +       }
> +
> +       prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);

I'm a bit lazy here, sorry, but isn't the name of the program known?
bpf_object__find_program_by_title() is preferable.

> +       if (!prog) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: finding a prog in obj file failed\n");
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto cleanup;
> +       }
> +
> +       map_fd = bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(obj, "ip_map");
> +       if (map_fd < 0) {
> +               fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: finding a map in obj file failed\n");
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto cleanup;
>         }
> +
>         signal(SIGINT, int_exit);
>         signal(SIGTERM, int_exit);
>
>         /* do sampling */
>         printf("Sampling at %d Hertz for %d seconds. Ctrl-C also ends.\n",
>                freq, secs);
> -       if (sampling_start(pmu_fd, freq) != 0)
> -               return 1;
> +       if (sampling_start(pmu_fd, freq, prog, link) != 0) {
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto cleanup;
> +       }
>         sleep(secs);
> -       sampling_end(pmu_fd);
> -       free(pmu_fd);
> +       sampling_end(link);
>
>         /* output sample counts */
> -       print_ip_map(map_fd[0]);
> +       print_ip_map(map_fd);
>
> -       return 0;
> +cleanup:
> +       free(pmu_fd);
> +       free(link);


Uhm... you are freeing this only on clean up. Also, you need to
bpf_link__destroy() first. And close all pmu_fds. Surely process exit
will ensure all this is cleaned up, but it's a good tone to clean up
all resources explicitly.

> +       return error;
>  }
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> index 356171bc392b..30c25ef99fc5 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/trace_event_user.c
> @@ -6,22 +6,21 @@
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  #include <string.h>
> -#include <fcntl.h>
> -#include <poll.h>
> -#include <sys/ioctl.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
>  #include <signal.h>
> -#include <assert.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <sys/resource.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
> -#include "bpf_load.h"
>  #include "perf-sys.h"
>  #include "trace_helpers.h"
>
>  #define SAMPLE_FREQ 50
>
> +/* counts, stackmap */
> +static int map_fd[2];
> +struct bpf_program *prog;
>  static bool sys_read_seen, sys_write_seen;
>
>  static void print_ksym(__u64 addr)
> @@ -137,9 +136,16 @@ static inline int generate_load(void)
>  static void test_perf_event_all_cpu(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>  {
>         int nr_cpus = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF);
> +       struct bpf_link **link = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(struct bpf_link *));

same as above, calloc() is better choice here

>         int *pmu_fd = malloc(nr_cpus * sizeof(int));
>         int i, error = 0;
>
> +       if (pmu_fd == NULL || link == NULL) {
> +               printf("malloc of pmu_fd/link failed\n");
> +               error = 1;
> +               goto err;
> +       }
> +
>         /* system wide perf event, no need to inherit */
>         attr->inherit = 0;
>
> @@ -151,8 +157,12 @@ static void test_perf_event_all_cpu(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>                         error = 1;
>                         goto all_cpu_err;
>                 }
> -               assert(ioctl(pmu_fd[i], PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF, prog_fd[0]) == 0);
> -               assert(ioctl(pmu_fd[i], PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE) == 0);
> +               link[i] = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(prog, pmu_fd[i]);
> +               if (link[i] < 0) {
> +                       printf("bpf_program__attach_perf_event failed\n");
> +                       error = 1;
> +                       goto all_cpu_err;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         if (generate_load() < 0) {
> @@ -161,11 +171,11 @@ static void test_perf_event_all_cpu(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>         }
>         print_stacks();
>  all_cpu_err:
> -       for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> -               ioctl(pmu_fd[i], PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE);
> -               close(pmu_fd[i]);
> -       }
> +       for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> +               bpf_link__destroy(link[i]);

still need close(pmu_fd[i]);

> +err:
>         free(pmu_fd);
> +       free(link);
>         if (error)
>                 int_exit(0);


>  }
> @@ -173,6 +183,7 @@ static void test_perf_event_all_cpu(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>  static void test_perf_event_task(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>  {
>         int pmu_fd, error = 0;
> +       struct bpf_link *link;
>
>         /* per task perf event, enable inherit so the "dd ..." command can be traced properly.
>          * Enabling inherit will cause bpf_perf_prog_read_time helper failure.
> @@ -185,8 +196,12 @@ static void test_perf_event_task(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>                 printf("sys_perf_event_open failed\n");
>                 int_exit(0);
>         }
> -       assert(ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF, prog_fd[0]) == 0);
> -       assert(ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE) == 0);
> +       link = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(prog, pmu_fd);
> +       if (link < 0) {
> +               printf("bpf_program__attach_perf_event failed\n");
> +               close(pmu_fd);
> +               int_exit(0);
> +       }
>
>         if (generate_load() < 0) {
>                 error = 1;
> @@ -194,8 +209,7 @@ static void test_perf_event_task(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>         }
>         print_stacks();
>  err:
> -       ioctl(pmu_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE);
> -       close(pmu_fd);
> +       bpf_link__destroy(link);
>         if (error)
>                 int_exit(0);

This will exit with 0 error code and won't notify about error... Pass
through err?

>  }
> @@ -282,7 +296,9 @@ static void test_bpf_perf_event(void)
>  int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  {
>         struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
> +       struct bpf_object *obj;
>         char filename[256];
> +       int prog_fd;
>
>         snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
>         setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
> @@ -295,9 +311,20 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                 return 1;
>         }
>
> -       if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
> -               printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
> -               return 2;
> +       if (bpf_prog_load(filename, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, &obj, &prog_fd))
> +               return 1;
> +
> +       prog = bpf_program__next(NULL, obj);
> +       if (!prog) {
> +               printf("finding a prog in obj file failed\n");
> +               return 1;
> +       }
> +
> +       map_fd[0] = bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(obj, "counts");
> +       map_fd[1] = bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(obj, "stackmap");
> +       if (map_fd[0] < 0 || map_fd[1] < 0) {
> +               printf("finding a counts/stackmap map in obj file failed\n");
> +               return 1;
>         }
>
>         if (fork() == 0) {
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ