lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb65f021-35e6-a5b2-cacb-06be89aebccf@isovalent.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:50:59 +0000
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...nsuse.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] libbpf: add null pointer check in
 bpf_object__init_user_btf_maps()

2020-03-12 16:37 UTC+0100 ~ Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> On 3/12/20 3:03 PM, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>> When compiling bpftool with clang 7, after the addition of its recent
>> "bpftool prog profile" feature, Michal reported a segfault. This
>> occurred while the build process was attempting to generate the
>> skeleton needed for the profiling program, with the following command:
>>
>>      ./_bpftool gen skeleton skeleton/profiler.bpf.o > profiler.skel.h
>>
>> Tracing the error showed that bpf_object__init_user_btf_maps() does no
>> verification on obj->btf before passing it to btf__get_nr_types(), where
>> btf is dereferenced. Libbpf considers BTF information should be here
>> because of the presence of a ".maps" section in the object file (hence
>> the check on "obj->efile.btf_maps_shndx < 0" fails and we do not exit
>> from the function early), but it was unable to load BTF info as there is
>> no .BTF section.
>>
>> Add a null pointer check and error out if the pointer is null. The final
>> bpftool executable still fails to build, but at least we have a proper
>> error and no more segfault.
>>
>> Fixes: abd29c931459 ("libbpf: allow specifying map definitions using
>> BTF")
>> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
>> Reported-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...nsuse.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
> 
> Applied to bpf-next, thanks! Note ...
> 
>> ---
>>   tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> index 223be01dc466..19c0c40e8a80 100644
>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>> @@ -2140,6 +2140,10 @@ static int
>> bpf_object__init_user_btf_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, bool strict,
>>           return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>>   +    if (!obj->btf) {
>> +        pr_warn("failed to retrieve BTF for map");
> 
> I've added a '\n' here

Sorry about that, thank you Daniel!
Quentin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ