netdev - Re: [PATCH 6/7] sfc: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <92ac1339-892c-20de-1547-02a8eee85f12@solarflare.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:53:05 +0000
From:   Martin Habets <mhabets@...arflare.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] sfc: Use scnprintf() for avoiding potential buffer
 overflow

Hi Takashi,

Fix looks ok, but could you please fix the alignment of the subsequent lines as well?

Thanks,
Martin

On 11/03/2020 08:37, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns the would-be-output size instead of the
> actual output size, the succeeding calls may go beyond the given
> buffer limit.  Fix it by replacing with scnprintf().
> 
> Cc: Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>
> Cc: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
> Cc: Martin Habets <mhabets@...arflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> index 2713300343c7..ac978e24644f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/mcdi.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,11 @@ static void efx_mcdi_send_request(struct efx_nic *efx, unsigned cmd,
>  		 * progress on a NIC at any one time.  So no need for locking.
>  		 */
>  		for (i = 0; i < hdr_len / 4 && bytes < PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> -			bytes += snprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
> +			bytes += scnprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
>  					  " %08x", le32_to_cpu(hdr[i].u32[0]));
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < inlen / 4 && bytes < PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> -			bytes += snprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
> +			bytes += scnprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
>  					  " %08x", le32_to_cpu(inbuf[i].u32[0]));
>  
>  		netif_info(efx, hw, efx->net_dev, "MCDI RPC REQ:%s\n", buf);
> @@ -302,14 +302,14 @@ static void efx_mcdi_read_response_header(struct efx_nic *efx)
>  		 */
>  		for (i = 0; i < hdr_len && bytes < PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
>  			efx->type->mcdi_read_response(efx, &hdr, (i * 4), 4);
> -			bytes += snprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
> +			bytes += scnprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
>  					  " %08x", le32_to_cpu(hdr.u32[0]));
>  		}
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < data_len && bytes < PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
>  			efx->type->mcdi_read_response(efx, &hdr,
>  					mcdi->resp_hdr_len + (i * 4), 4);
> -			bytes += snprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
> +			bytes += scnprintf(buf + bytes, PAGE_SIZE - bytes,
>  					  " %08x", le32_to_cpu(hdr.u32[0]));
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ void efx_mcdi_print_fwver(struct efx_nic *efx, char *buf, size_t len)
>  	}
>  
>  	ver_words = (__le16 *)MCDI_PTR(outbuf, GET_VERSION_OUT_VERSION);
> -	offset = snprintf(buf, len, "%u.%u.%u.%u",
> +	offset = scnprintf(buf, len, "%u.%u.%u.%u",
>  			  le16_to_cpu(ver_words[0]), le16_to_cpu(ver_words[1]),
>  			  le16_to_cpu(ver_words[2]), le16_to_cpu(ver_words[3]));
>  
> @@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ void efx_mcdi_print_fwver(struct efx_nic *efx, char *buf, size_t len)
>  	if (efx_nic_rev(efx) >= EFX_REV_HUNT_A0) {
>  		struct efx_ef10_nic_data *nic_data = efx->nic_data;
>  
> -		offset += snprintf(buf + offset, len - offset, " rx%x tx%x",
> +		offset += scnprintf(buf + offset, len - offset, " rx%x tx%x",
>  				   nic_data->rx_dpcpu_fw_id,
>  				   nic_data->tx_dpcpu_fw_id);
>  
>