netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09d6c2d7-b632-3dd1-2c9d-736ccc18d4a9@web.de>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:17:37 +0100
From:   Soeren Moch <smoch@....de>
To:     chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset


On 13.03.20 12:03, Chi-Hsien Lin wrote:
> On 12/16/2019 7:43, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019, 22:24:10 CET schrieb Soeren Moch:
>>> On 12.12.19 11:59, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>>> On 12.12.19 10:42, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>>> Soeren Moch <smoch@....de> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Add support for the BCM4359 chipset with SDIO interface and RSDB
>>>>>> support
>>>>>> to the brcmfmac wireless network driver in patches 1-7.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Enhance devicetree of the RockPro64 arm64/rockchip board to use an
>>>>>> AP6359SA based wifi/bt combo module with this chipset in patches
>>>>>> 8-9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chung-Hsien Hsu (1):
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: set F2 blocksize and watermark for 4359
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Soeren Moch (5):
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: fix rambase for 4359/9
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: make errors when setting roaming parameters non-fatal
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: add support for BCM4359 SDIO chipset
>>>>>>    arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: enable wifi module at sdio0
>>>>>>    arm64: dts: rockchip: RockPro64: hook up bluetooth at uart0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wright Feng (3):
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: reset two D11 cores if chip has two D11 cores
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: add RSDB condition when setting interface combinations
>>>>>>    brcmfmac: not set mbss in vif if firmware does not support MBSS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64.dts    | 50 +++++++++++---
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c      |  8 ++-
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c    | 68
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++----
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.c        | 54 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/chip.h        |  1 +
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c        |  2 +-
>>>>>>   .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c        | 17 +++++
>>>>>>   include/linux/mmc/sdio_ids.h                  |  2 +
>>>>>>   8 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>>>> Just to make sure we are on the same page, I will apply patches
>>>>> 1-7 to
>>>>> wireless-drivers-next and patches 8-9 go to some other tree? And
>>>>> there
>>>>> are no dependencies between the brcmfmac patches and dts patches?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, this also is my understanding. I'm glad if you are fine with
>>>> patches 1-7.
>>>> Heiko will pick up patches 8-9 later for linux-rockchip independently.
>>>> And if we need another round of review for patches 8-9, I think we
>>>> don't
>>>> need to bother linux-wireless with this.
>>>
>>> Heiko,
>>>
>>> is this OK for you when patches 1-7 are merged now in wireless-drivers,
>>> and then I send a v3 for patches 8-9 only for you to merge in
>>> linux-rockchip later? Or do you prefer a full v3 for the whole series
>>> with only this pending clock name update in patch 9?
>>
>> Nope, merging 1-7 from this v2 and then getting a v3 with only the dts
>> stuff is perfectly fine :-)
>
> Soeren,
>
> I suppose patch 1-7 from this serious are all good for merging. Is
> that right? If so, could you please create a rebased V3?
Chi-hsien,

Thanks for asking, but these patches are already merged in
torvalds/v5.6-rc1 as commits
1b8d2e0a9e42..2635853ce4ab

So everything already fine with this.

Thanks,
Soeren

>
>
> Regards,
> Chi-hsien Lin
>
>>
>> Heiko
>>
>>
>> .
>>