netdev - [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix nanosleep for real this time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200313233535.3557677-1-andriin@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:35:35 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>
CC:     <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/bpf: fix nanosleep for real this time

Amazingly, some libc implementations don't call __NR_nanosleep syscall from
their nanosleep() APIs. Hammer it down with explicit syscall() call and never
get back to it again. Also simplify code for timespec initialization.

I verified that nanosleep is called w/ printk and in exactly same Linux image
that is used in Travis CI. So it should both sleep and call correct syscall.

Fixes: 4e1fd25d19e8 ("selftests/bpf: Fix usleep() implementation")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index f85a06512541..6956d722a463 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -35,16 +35,12 @@ struct prog_test_def {
  */
 int usleep(useconds_t usec)
 {
-	struct timespec ts;
-
-	if (usec > 999999) {
-		ts.tv_sec = usec / 1000000;
-		ts.tv_nsec = usec % 1000000;
-	} else {
-		ts.tv_sec = 0;
-		ts.tv_nsec = usec;
-	}
-	return nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
+	struct timespec ts = {
+		.tv_sec = usec / 1000000,
+		.tv_nsec = usec % 1000000,
+	};
+
+	return syscall(__NR_nanosleep, &ts, NULL);
 }
 
 static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)
-- 
2.17.1