netdev - Re: [EXT] [PATCH 1/4] net: fec: set GPR bit on suspend by DT connfiguration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANh8QzxNYzLL8sAXwYEnic2-o-3xzyQaUZZ3LmaRO7fCfgoLQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:35:49 +0100
From:   "Fuzzey, Martin" <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>
To:     Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH 1/4] net: fec: set GPR bit on suspend by DT connfiguration.

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 07:26, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com> wrote:
>
> From: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 12:50 AM
> > +static int fec_enet_of_parse_stop_mode(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
> > +                                      struct device_node *np) {
> > +       static const char prop[] = "fsl,stop-mode";
> > +       struct of_phandle_args args;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, prop, 2, 0, &args);
> To save memory:
>
>                  ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, "fsl,stop-mode", 2, 0, &args);
>

Why would this save memory?
prop is defined static const char[] (and not char *) so there will no
be extra pointers.

I haven't checked the generated assembler but this should generate the
same code as a string litteral I think.

It is also reused later in the function in a debug (which is the
reason I did it this way to ensure the property name is unique and
consistent.

Regards,

Martin

--