netdev - [RFC PATCH 03/28] tcp: move tcp_in_ack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:37:44 +0200
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Olivier Tilmans <olivier.tilmans@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 03/28] tcp: move tcp_in_ack_event later

From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...helsinki.fi>

Accurate ECN's heuristics does not know if there is going
to be ACE field based CE counter increase or not until after
rtx queue has been processed. Only then the number of ACKed
bytes/pkts is available.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...helsinki.fi>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 3525ec8edd54..860938e0f1b6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3539,12 +3539,23 @@ static void tcp_process_tlp_ack(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, int flag)
 	}
 }
 
-static inline void tcp_in_ack_event(struct sock *sk, u32 flags)
+static inline void tcp_in_ack_event(struct sock *sk, int flag)
 {
 	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
 
-	if (icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event)
-		icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event(sk, flags);
+	if (icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event) {
+		u32 ack_ev_flags = 0;
+
+		if (flag & FLAG_WIN_UPDATE)
+			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE;
+		if (flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) {
+			ack_ev_flags = CA_ACK_SLOWPATH;
+			if (flag & FLAG_ECE)
+				ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_ECE;
+		}
+
+		icsk->icsk_ca_ops->in_ack_event(sk, ack_ev_flags);
+	}
 }
 
 /* Congestion control has updated the cwnd already. So if we're in
@@ -3657,12 +3668,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 		tcp_snd_una_update(tp, ack);
 		flag |= FLAG_WIN_UPDATE;
 
-		tcp_in_ack_event(sk, CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE);
-
 		NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPHPACKS);
 	} else {
-		u32 ack_ev_flags = CA_ACK_SLOWPATH;
-
 		if (ack_seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)
 			flag |= FLAG_DATA;
 		else
@@ -3674,15 +3681,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 			flag |= tcp_sacktag_write_queue(sk, skb, prior_snd_una,
 							&sack_state);
 
-		if (tcp_ecn_rcv_ecn_echo(tp, tcp_hdr(skb))) {
+		if (tcp_ecn_rcv_ecn_echo(tp, tcp_hdr(skb)))
 			flag |= FLAG_ECE;
-			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_ECE;
-		}
-
-		if (flag & FLAG_WIN_UPDATE)
-			ack_ev_flags |= CA_ACK_WIN_UPDATE;
-
-		tcp_in_ack_event(sk, ack_ev_flags);
 	}
 
 	/* We passed data and got it acked, remove any soft error
@@ -3699,6 +3699,8 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 
 	tcp_rack_update_reo_wnd(sk, &rs);
 
+	tcp_in_ack_event(sk, flag);
+
 	if (tp->tlp_high_seq)
 		tcp_process_tlp_ack(sk, ack, flag);
 	/* If needed, reset TLP/RTO timer; RACK may later override this. */
@@ -3728,6 +3730,7 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 	return 1;
 
 no_queue:
+	tcp_in_ack_event(sk, flag);
 	/* If data was DSACKed, see if we can undo a cwnd reduction. */
 	if (flag & FLAG_DSACKING_ACK) {
 		tcp_fastretrans_alert(sk, prior_snd_una, num_dupack, &flag,
-- 
2.20.1