lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319162806.25705-3-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:27:57 +0200
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 02/11] net: ethernet: ti: ale: fix seeing unreg mcast packets with promisc and allmulti disabled

On AM65xx MCU CPSW2G NUSS and 66AK2E/L NUSS the unregistered multicast
packets are still can be received with promisc and allmulti disabled.

This happens, because ALE VLAN entries on these SoCs do not contain port
masks for reg/unreg mcast packets, but instead store indexes of
ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUXx_REG registers which intended for store port masks for
reg/unreg mcast packets.

ALE VLAN entry:UNREG_MCAST_FLOOD_INDEX -> ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUXx
ALE VLAN entry:REG_MCAST_FLOOD_INDEX -> ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUXy

The commit b361da837392 ("net: netcp: ale: add proper ale entry mask bits
for netcp switch ALE") update ALE code to support such ALE entries, it is
always used ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUX0_REG index in ALE VLAN entry for unreg mcast
packets mask configuration, which is read-only, at least for AM65xx MCU
CPSW2G NUSS and 66AK2E/L NUSS. As result unreg mcast packets are allowed
always.

Hence, update ALE code to use ALE_VLAN_MASK_MUX1_REG index for ALE VLAN
entries to configure unreg mcast port mask.

Fixes: b361da837392 ("net: netcp: ale: add proper ale entry mask bits for netcp switch ALE")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Tested-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c
index ecdbde539eb7..5815225c000c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_ale.c
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ DEFINE_ALE_FIELD(mcast,			40,	1)
 DEFINE_ALE_FIELD(vlan_unreg_mcast_idx,	20,	3)
 DEFINE_ALE_FIELD(vlan_reg_mcast_idx,	44,	3)
 
+#define NU_VLAN_UNREG_MCAST_IDX	1
+
 /* The MAC address field in the ALE entry cannot be macroized as above */
 static inline void cpsw_ale_get_addr(u32 *ale_entry, u8 *addr)
 {
@@ -455,6 +457,8 @@ int cpsw_ale_add_vlan(struct cpsw_ale *ale, u16 vid, int port_mask, int untag,
 		cpsw_ale_set_vlan_unreg_mcast(ale_entry, unreg_mcast,
 					      ale->vlan_field_bits);
 	} else {
+		cpsw_ale_set_vlan_unreg_mcast_idx(ale_entry,
+						  NU_VLAN_UNREG_MCAST_IDX);
 		cpsw_ale_set_vlan_mcast(ale, ale_entry, reg_mcast, unreg_mcast);
 	}
 	cpsw_ale_set_vlan_member_list(ale_entry, port_mask,
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ