[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319165802.30898-5-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:57:56 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: switch to use new .gettimex64() interface
The CPTS HW latches and saves CPTS counter value in CPTS fifo immediately
after writing to CPSW_CPTS_PUSH.TS_PUSH (bit 0), so the total time that the
driver needs to read the CPTS timestamp is the time required CPSW_CPTS_PUSH
write to actually reach HW.
Hence switch CPTS driver to implement new .gettimex64() callback for more
precise measurement of the offset between a PHC and the system clock which
is measured as time between
write(CPSW_CPTS_PUSH)
read(CPSW_CPTS_PUSH)
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
index e6a8ccae711c..7e4c1de0d207 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c
@@ -203,9 +203,13 @@ static u64 cpts_systim_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
return READ_ONCE(cpts->cur_timestamp);
}
-static void cpts_update_cur_time(struct cpts *cpts, int match)
+static void cpts_update_cur_time(struct cpts *cpts, int match,
+ struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts)
{
+ ptp_read_system_prets(sts);
cpts_write32(cpts, TS_PUSH, ts_push);
+ cpts_read32(cpts, ts_push);
+ ptp_read_system_postts(sts);
if (cpts_fifo_read(cpts, match) && match != -1)
dev_err(cpts->dev, "cpts: unable to obtain a time stamp\n");
@@ -234,7 +238,7 @@ static int cpts_ptp_adjfreq(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s32 ppb)
cpts->mult_new = neg_adj ? mult - diff : mult + diff;
- cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, CPTS_EV_PUSH);
+ cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, CPTS_EV_PUSH, NULL);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpts->lock, flags);
@@ -253,15 +257,17 @@ static int cpts_ptp_adjtime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s64 delta)
return 0;
}
-static int cpts_ptp_gettime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, struct timespec64 *ts)
+static int cpts_ptp_gettimeex(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
+ struct timespec64 *ts,
+ struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts)
{
- u64 ns;
- unsigned long flags;
struct cpts *cpts = container_of(ptp, struct cpts, info);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ u64 ns;
spin_lock_irqsave(&cpts->lock, flags);
- cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, CPTS_EV_PUSH);
+ cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, CPTS_EV_PUSH, sts);
ns = timecounter_read(&cpts->tc);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpts->lock, flags);
@@ -302,7 +308,7 @@ static long cpts_overflow_check(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
spin_lock_irqsave(&cpts->lock, flags);
- cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, -1);
+ cpts_update_cur_time(cpts, -1, NULL);
ns = timecounter_read(&cpts->tc);
@@ -326,7 +332,7 @@ static const struct ptp_clock_info cpts_info = {
.pps = 0,
.adjfreq = cpts_ptp_adjfreq,
.adjtime = cpts_ptp_adjtime,
- .gettime64 = cpts_ptp_gettime,
+ .gettimex64 = cpts_ptp_gettimeex,
.settime64 = cpts_ptp_settime,
.enable = cpts_ptp_enable,
.do_aux_work = cpts_overflow_check,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists