[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2003192222320.5256@whs-18.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:25:23 +0200 (EET)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...helsinki.fi>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Olivier Tilmans <olivier.tilmans@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/28]: Accurate ECN for TCP
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:43:04 +0200
>
> > Comments would be highly appreciated.
>
> Two coding style comments which you should audit your entire submission
> for:
>
> 1) Please order local variables in reverse christmas tree ordering (longest
> to shortest long)
Does this apply also to the usual struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); line
or can it be put first if there are some dependencies on it?
> 2) Please do not use the inline keyword in foo.c files, let the compiler
> decide.
Thanks. I'll do those (I certainly removed some other bits I moved from
header to .c but missed a few it seems).
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists