[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319155236.3d8537c5@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:52:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing
program when attaching XDP
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:13:13 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
>
> While it is currently possible for userspace to specify that an existing
> XDP program should not be replaced when attaching to an interface, there is
> no mechanism to safely replace a specific XDP program with another.
>
> This patch adds a new netlink attribute, IFLA_XDP_EXPECTED_FD, which can be
> set along with IFLA_XDP_FD. If set, the kernel will check that the program
> currently loaded on the interface matches the expected one, and fail the
> operation if it does not. This corresponds to a 'cmpxchg' memory operation.
>
> A new companion flag, XDP_FLAGS_EXPECT_FD, is also added to explicitly
> request checking of the EXPECTED_FD attribute. This is needed for userspace
> to discover whether the kernel supports the new attribute.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
I didn't know we wanted to go ahead with this...
If we do please run this thru checkpatch, set .strict_start_type, and
make the expected fd unsigned. A negative expected fd makes no sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists