[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158461883093.3094720.4502121814429124960.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:53:51 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 3/6] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg(MSG_WAITALL) handling
Fix the handling of sendmsg() with MSG_WAITALL for userspace to round the
timeout for when a signal occurs up to at least two jiffies as a 1 jiffy
timeout may end up being effectively 0 if jiffies wraps at the wrong time.
Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 1eccfb92c9e1..0fcf157aa09f 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ static int rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_waitall(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
rtt = READ_ONCE(call->peer->rtt);
rtt2 = nsecs_to_jiffies64(rtt) * 2;
- if (rtt2 < 1)
- rtt2 = 1;
+ if (rtt2 < 2)
+ rtt2 = 2;
timeout = rtt2;
tx_start = READ_ONCE(call->tx_hard_ack);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists