netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: ipv6: add rpl source routing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:46:47 -0400
From:   Michael Richardson <mcr@...delman.ca>
To:     Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, dav.lebrun@...il.com, stefan@...enfreihafen.org,
        kai.beckmann@...rm.de, martin.gergeleit@...rm.de,
        robert.kaiser@...rm.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 0/5] net: ipv6: add rpl source routing


Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com> wrote:
    > should happen. So far I understand there exists a draft yet which
    > describes the cases (inclusive a Hop-by-Hop option which we also not
    > support yet).

    > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-35

The need for the hop-by-hop encapsulation is, I hope, now unnecessary.

draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves describes how very low duty cycle systems
(window-smash alerts, etc.) could participate in RPL without being routers.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@...delman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (488 bytes)