[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319204358.7e141f1a@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:43:58 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/6] ionic: ignore eexist on rx filter add
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:31:51 -0700 Shannon Nelson wrote:
> Don't worry if the rx filter add firmware request fails on
> EEXIST, at least we know the filter is there. Same for
> the delete request, at least we know it isn't there.
>
> Fixes: 2a654540be10 ("ionic: Add Rx filter and rx_mode ndo support")
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
Why could the filter be there? Seems like the FW shouldn't have filters
the driver didn't add, could a flush/reset command help to start from
clean state?
Just curious.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists