netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: mscc: rename enum rgmii_rx_clock_delay to rgmii_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+h21hqVEgq-bnj-9E+75eXOVWmc4zoDKos1g8UXV12SjgSemg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:28:25 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: phy: mscc: rename enum
 rgmii_rx_clock_delay to rgmii_clock_delay

On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 19:01, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > And to add to that: without documentation, I don't really know what
> > I'm consolidating.
>
> It looked like the defines for the delays could be shared. But if you
> are not happy with this, lets leave it as is.
>
>     Andrew

To be honest, the reason why I'm not happy respinning is that I'll
need to backport these patches to a 5.4 kernel. I have nothing against
sending some further consolidation patches with Antoine's work, but
respinning this series would mean that I'd also need to backport
Antoine's patches.

Thanks,
-Vladimir