[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWRKW3HoWk+drmbwKi6wArN9qjgjp=8NcyBK7P2kT=cLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:00:08 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nft_fwd_netdev: Fix CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=n build
Hi Pablo,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:40 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:33:00AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > If CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT=n:
> >
> > net/netfilter/nft_fwd_netdev.c: In function ‘nft_fwd_netdev_eval’:
> > net/netfilter/nft_fwd_netdev.c:32:10: error: ‘struct sk_buff’ has no member named ‘tc_redirected’
> > pkt->skb->tc_redirected = 1;
> > ^~
> > net/netfilter/nft_fwd_netdev.c:33:10: error: ‘struct sk_buff’ has no member named ‘tc_from_ingress’
> > pkt->skb->tc_from_ingress = 1;
> > ^~
> >
> > Fix this by protecting this code hunk with the appropriate #ifdef.
>
> Sorry about this, and thank you for fixing up this so fast.
>
> I'm attaching an alternative fix to avoid a dependency on tc from
> netfilter. Still testing, if fine and no objections I'll formally
> submit this.
Thanks, that fixes the issue, too.
(Note that I didn't do a full build).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists