netdev - Re: [PATCH] e1000e: bump up timeout to wait when ME un-configure ULP mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:17:15 +0800
From:   Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To:     Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>
Cc:     "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS" 
        <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000e: bump up timeout to wait when ME un-configure ULP
 mode

Hi Aaron,

> On Mar 24, 2020, at 03:16, Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com> wrote:
> 
> ME takes 2+ seconds to un-configure ULP mode done after resume
> from s2idle on some ThinkPad laptops.
> Without enough wait, reset and re-init will fail with error.

Thanks, this patch solves the issue. We can drop the DMI quirk in favor of this patch.

> 
> Fixes: f15bb6dde738cc8fa0 ("e1000e: Add support for S0ix")
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865570
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Ma <aaron.ma@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index b4135c50e905..147b15a2f8b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -1240,9 +1240,9 @@ static s32 e1000_disable_ulp_lpt_lp(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool force)
> 			ew32(H2ME, mac_reg);
> 		}
> 
> -		/* Poll up to 300msec for ME to clear ULP_CFG_DONE. */
> +		/* Poll up to 2.5sec for ME to clear ULP_CFG_DONE. */
> 		while (er32(FWSM) & E1000_FWSM_ULP_CFG_DONE) {
> -			if (i++ == 30) {
> +			if (i++ == 250) {
> 				ret_val = -E1000_ERR_PHY;
> 				goto out;
> 			}

The return value was not caught by the caller, so the error ends up unnoticed.
Maybe let the caller check the return value of e1000_disable_ulp_lpt_lp()?

Kai-Heng

> -- 
> 2.17.1
>